3 ms·
Which suggests the funding going directly to cancer research remains the waste energy done in vain. When its just random other research that winds up having the
by vmception 5y ago
Which suggests the funding going directly to cancer research remains the waste energy done in vain. When its just random other research that winds up having the most efficacy.
- dmos62 5y agoI don't see a logical path from one to the other.
- pfdietz 5y agoThere was a lot of research between "discovering this cool chemical has an effect on bacteria" and "it's now the standard treatment curing 85% of testicular cancers."
- s1artibartfast 5y agoWhat a short sighted commitment. 1) a lot of cancer research occurred between the random bacteria observation and viable chemotherapy. 2) ignoring the above, you still have too compare the success rate of funding cancer research vs random experiments.