4 ms·
I assume you're an American living in a warm climate? I get the sense you don't understand what you're asking for. Gas isn't just used for heating people. Abou
by ZGDUwpqEWpUZ 5y ago
I assume you're an American living in a warm climate? I get the sense you don't understand what you're asking for.
Gas isn't just used for heating people. About 20% of Europe's power is generated using gas, and there is not enough spare capacity to compensate for that.
Germany is currently looking to extend the operating life of its nuclear powerplants and will indeed have to consider replacing them despite pledging not to. France and the UK are ahead on this, with the latter investing heavily in small-scale nuclear reactors. The first of those will still take another 10 years to arrive, though.
Even if gas was just for heating buildings, what you're asking for would kill quite a lot of elderly and vulnerable people. In the UK alone, it's estimated that 3000 people die each year due to fuel poverty already, and the UK is far from the coldest country in the region. Europe is not California.
You are of course correct that we should reduce dependence on fossil fuels (Russian or otherwise), and it was a major error of judgement by our leaders (over several decades) to get us into this position, but that cannot be rectified overnight.
- hnov 5y agoI grew up without running water, electricity or heat in the 90s. I've had to read by candlelight, breathed kerosene fumes indoors to stay warm and burned old newspapers to climb up to the 10th floor apartment where we lived in complete darkness. I know exactly what I'm talking about. It's pure hypocrisy that you want the other side to suffer now, but you want to roll off your reliance on Gazprom on a timescale of a decade as to not be inconvenienced.
- ZGDUwpqEWpUZ 5y agoWe have a goal, but there is a limit to what we'll sacrifice to achieve it. It's no more complex than that, and definitely not hypocrisy.