2 ms·
That doesn't make sense linguistically. Can you provide a falsifiable definition of "turtles"?
by diordiderot 5y ago
That doesn't make sense linguistically.
Can you provide a falsifiable definition of "turtles"?
- Stupulous 5y ago"Turtles are all animals with shells" is falsifiable in the sense that you can say an animal without a shell is falsely called a turtle, and that an example of an animal with a shell that is not a turtle disproves the definition. Not clear which sense is being asked for here, but it does parse.
- diordiderot 5y agoI feel like what you'd actually be falsifying is. "That thing is a turtle" Rather than it's definition. Honestly not trying to be pedantic.