3 ms·

I think calling web components "cumbersome" belies the intention of the APIs, which is to enable custom HTML elements, encapsulation, and interop - fairly low-l

I think calling web components "cumbersome" belies the intention of the APIs, which is to enable custom HTML elements, encapsulation, and interop - fairly low-level concerns. Lit takes care of templating and reactivity. Web components don't have those, it's expected that you use other methods, including what you already use, to create DOM and react to state changes. The DOM may eventually add templating and reactivity, but that's a pretty big question given how many approaches and syntaxes there are. Until then libraries are fine and allow for multiple opinions.

jimmont 5y ago
Only a clarifying point to add about Lit: tagged templates provide templating and have native support, all Lit does is provide API extensions for reactivity, ie state management. So when a portion of a template is associated with an object, only that part is updated due to how the libraries work. And this is fundamentally all the it provides (unless I've misunderstood something). Lit-html provides functional state+template views while LitElement provides the OO/class oriented lifecycle approach--collectively now rebranded as "Lit". https://lit.dev/ https://lit.dev/ Please call out corrections as needed.