4 ms·
I was always under the impression that Docker had support for having different architectures under the same tag, and that the client would pull the image that m
by mikey_p 5y ago
I was always under the impression that Docker had support for having different architectures under the same tag, and that the client would pull the image that matches the client's architecture, ala most package managers. Is that not the case?
- anamexis 5y agoYes, but only if the publisher publishes images with that architecture.
- Judson 5y agoThat is the case, but there are no mysql-supplied arm64 packages for ubuntu/debian[0]. Ubuntu/Debian have packages, but maintain their own set of patches, which the docker team would like to avoid using[1]. [0]: https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=103462 https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=103462 [1]: https://github.com/docker-library/mysql/issues/318 https://github.com/docker-library/mysql/issues/318
- emmanuelgautier 5y agoThat is exactly the point of the post. MySQL has no image built for the arm64 architecture even if docker provides a way to provide it for the same tag. This post is focused on MySQL but you have other images with the same issue.