10 ms·
I know there's no malicious intent, I'm just sad that such a basic thing is preventing people from reading the post. I'm happy when people are picking holes in
by StevenWaterman 5y ago
I know there's no malicious intent, I'm just sad that such a basic thing is preventing people from reading the post. I'm happy when people are picking holes in the content - that's all valuable discussion we wouldn't have had otherwise, but I don't think anyone's going to argue in favor of making your website not fit on a mobile screen!
- jamal-kumar 5y agoI 100% agree with your point with what you can do without javascript but like... test on mobile first we can't read your site it's like 6am where I am and I am NOT getting out of bed to read this on a computer
- StevenWaterman 5y agoIt's fixed now, so you should be able to read it fine on mobile. The reason it was broken was because when writing the toy examples, I went in with the mindset of creating an example rather than production code, and set them all to a static `width: 25em` - forgetting that these toy examples were going to be inlined into the page. Silly mistake, should be checking each post before publishing, learnt my lesson now!