3 ms·
Absolutely unrelated to the article, but does anyone else hate prefaces? I was a big reader (bk-before kids) and once read a preface that was so thoroughly shi
by roomey 5y ago
Absolutely unrelated to the article, but does anyone else hate prefaces?
I was a big reader (bk-before kids) and once read a preface that was so thoroughly shit that I almost didn't read the book. I ended up skipping the whole thing, and the book was excellent, had me from the first line!
From then on I never, or very rarely read a preface. I would value others opinions on this cause I just can't see the point of them.
The link for example; what benefit to the story would that be if you read it before animal farm? To me it would wreak the story, totally full of spoilers and also, putting forth the authors understanding of his own work, which in turn reduces the readers freedom of interpretation.
In summary, should prefaces actually be postfaces? (connected by a little perforated strip which can be removed and fucked in the bin)
- phgn 5y agoI absolutely agree with you. Worst IMHO are the prefaces written posthumously that talk about the impact and interpretation of the book. It's like they don't want you to make up your own mind, but simply experience this "award-winning" experience. Which may also be the reason prefaces are at the front and not the back of the book.
- roomey 5y agoOr a "celebrity" preface..it's almost a bigger deal than the book itself. It always makes me think the book will be shit, but that is unfair too. I guess that's why I try ignore them... Glad I'm not the only one!