That's absence of evidence, not evidence of absence. The dogma is that you can't get N. meningitidis invasive infection from food, but this case is no way provi

That's absence of evidence, not evidence of absence. The dogma is that you can't get N. meningitidis invasive infection from food, but this case is no way provides evidence to support that you can't. Also, I oppose the label "disinformation", apparently a bunch of people got confused, including ProMED, no one is/was trying to pull anything.