> Perhaps those who support these plans could try countering these arguments These discussions are being had, as part of the EU process. This is a proposal, no

> Perhaps those who support these plans could try countering these arguments These discussions are being had, as part of the EU process. This is a proposal, not a decree, and is being submitted by a body with some democratic legitimacy. > Some might argue that the government enforcing which websites are trusted looks a lot like a tyranny. As long as the government is an actual expression of popular will, mediated through the various mechanisms of social democracy, it's hard to argue that it would be a less democratic stance than letting an unaccountable foreign company in charge of things.