4 ms·
Better is hard to define, as the root parent of this thread says, as you cannot directly compare, say, BBQ, to a molecular gastronomy meal; they are simply in d
by cercatrova 5y ago
Better is hard to define, as the root parent of this thread says, as you cannot directly compare, say, BBQ, to a molecular gastronomy meal; they are simply in different classes, "better" cannot be compared.
That being said, if you like the food, then eat it, and if not, don't, regardless of whether it's Michelin or not.
- hunterb123 5y agoBetter is subjective and of course a person can compare two different types of restaurants. You do it every time you go out to determine where you want to go. You compare the two based on value, taste, frequency, and atmosphere. All subjective of course, but it's a personal preference you can compare. If the food was awful, the atmosphere or "novelty" was uncomfortable/unenjoyable/mediocre, the price was high in option A, you will feel cheated and would have rather had gone to option B. That experience will influence future decisions when comparing and deciding on a place.