I am confused, how would a 40% reduction of current software salaries in the US for top talent due to competition mean exploiting people? Are you against train

I am confused, how would a 40% reduction of current software salaries in the US for top talent due to competition mean exploiting people? Are you against training more doctors too because they would make less money and therefore be more exploited? What about the people who buy their services? Or do I misunderstand? There certainly are exploitive labor practices but I don't think being for decreasing the costs of a profession due to free competition has to be equated to being for exploiting people of that profession. I think that many industries and use cases could benefit from software automation, but it is expensive to hire those people. If they are good there is endless demand for their skills in ad tech alone, where they can afford to pay them a salary and benefits valued over 20-30% of the gross profit that entire company brings in a year.