4 ms·
Really depends on the appetite, and the restaurant. It's a bit like an art museum. You can go get a ticket to the Hermitage, and you would probably need 3 full
by deanCommie 5y ago
Really depends on the appetite, and the restaurant.
It's a bit like an art museum. You can go get a ticket to the Hermitage, and you would probably need 3 full days to see every single thing in it.
For the same price, there might be some museum that shows only a few paintings.
Does that mean the bigger museum the better the value? Kind of? If the goal is to get an experience, there are many ways to experience some emotions (and in the restaurant's case flavours) that won't lead to thorough "satiation", but would still be novel.
Some museums are like that, and you'll want to go see an Avengers movie afterwards to satisfy your entertainment.
Some restaurants are like that, and you'll hit MacDonalds on teh way back.
But more often than not, Michelin-echelon restaurants will overwhelm you with a ton of tiny courses, by the end of which you will be fairly adequately stuffed.
- ghaff 5y ago3-4 hours is probably about the limit of how much time I can handle a given museum. Much past that, I'm "OK. It's a Rembrandt but it's not one of his really good ones." If it's the Hermitage, I'll make an exception but I'll really start zoning out after a while.