3 ms·
I am arguing, specifically, that your reverse proxy respects neither the spirit nor the letter of the AGPL and does not provide the kind of protections that you
by cxr 5y ago
I am arguing, specifically, that your reverse proxy respects neither the spirit nor the letter of the AGPL and does not provide the kind of protections that you're claiming it would.
(Separately, if ever the words "come on" make their way into your response, or you have to try to invent an argument for another person so that you can simultaneously take it down, then your own argument is probably junk. Here you've done both.)
- marcan_42 5y agoYou argued, specifically, that, > You're modifying the program whether you've touched any files containing plain text source code or not. And that is just not how copyright works. (Separately, if you ever find yourself linking to completely unrelated comments by the person you are replying to in order to construct an attack on them personally, then your own argument is probably nonsense, and you're probably not a fun person to have around.)
- cxr 5y agoDo less Twitter.