3 ms·
Ditto. There've already been multiple posts saying "don't get the base model instead of the touch" that I don't understand. Their "touch" screen uses infrared
by bsuto 15y ago
Ditto. There've already been multiple posts saying "don't get the base model instead of the touch" that I don't understand.
Their "touch" screen uses infrared instead of a capacitive or resistive panel, and I anticipate lots of accidental and frustrating page turns. It looks like the touch model has no side buttons from the press photos, so tapping on the screen is necessary instead of applying slightly more pressure to the bezel you're already holding. This may just be me, but I find that to work just fine.
The battery life of the base model is half that of the touch model, sure, but it's still a month. Is that really a problem for anyone? They can't use an outlet or USB port four hours a month?
Trimming space by getting rid of the keyboard and speeding up page turn "flashes" are great upgrades to an already great device.
- schleyfox 15y agoThe one major advantage of the keyboard on the old models (and why I'm glad they are still being sold) is for students using ebooks in class. For my literature discussions we often have to reference specific sections so the keyboard, while crap, allows you to quickly search out a key phrase in the section under discussion. Page number mappings are still not all that available and often time off of weird editions that aren't even close to standard real paperback editions.