3 ms·
Yes, Reach media is notorious for the crapness of it's UX experience. It's presumably designed that way intentionally, I mean, they must know. I have no idea o
by mellosouls 5y ago
Yes, Reach media is notorious for the crapness of it's UX experience. It's presumably designed that way intentionally, I mean, they must know.
I have no idea of the thinking behind it but I hope the devs, testers and designers behind it hide that part of their experience on their CVs.
I mean, the shame they must feel.
- kuboble 5y agoWell... I have second hand knowledge that developers and managers of www.programmzeitung.ch are satisfied with their good and modern website.
- unfocussed_mike 5y agoThey know. But I suspect there is so little money in local news now (partly because of the internet and partly because of the collapse of newspaper-driven local commerce, small ads, all that), that they do not care; they are in a toxic relationship with the only advertising that pays, and to step outside that and construct a local news model that would be sustainable and not abusive to its readers is the stuff of romance novels and Hallmark movies. With the Reach sites I am surprised by some of the design elements that could be improved even without touching the aggressively bad advertising design, though. The typical "where I live" selector could be so much better.