> I'm just suggesting that period of time is longer than suggested by the parent. The parent's estimates track with adjustments made to the "Polestar 2’s LCA

> I'm just suggesting that period of time is longer than suggested by the parent. The parent's estimates track with adjustments made to the "Polestar 2’s LCA (Life Cycle Assessment)". The assessment originally stated the break even point was somewhere around 50,000 miles but it was quickly pointed out that the paper was neglecting to take into account the carbon impact of ICE vehicles and fuels at several stages. As well as identifying discrepancies due to geographic production and completely unsubstantiated irregularities. After taking those things into account the break even point was estimated to be 16,000 mi. https://insideevs.com/news/458458/legacy-automakers-backed-study-against-evs-debunked/ https://insideevs.com/news/458458/legacy-automakers-backed-s... Why the disparity? Just look at who published the assessment and where their interests lie.