8 ms·
Does systemd vs init.d come into play here? Those are the primary boot/startup frameworks, correct? Is LFS only init.d? Or do you make your own bootstrap proces
by AtlasBarfed 5y ago
Does systemd vs init.d come into play here? Those are the primary boot/startup frameworks, correct? Is LFS only init.d? Or do you make your own bootstrap process along the way?
- FateOfNations 5y agoThey have versions for both: https://linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/read.html https://linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/read.html
- Sophira 5y agoHeads-up: You linked to Beyond LFS, the book for extending an already finished LFS system. The book for installing LFS is https://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/read.html https://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/read.html, which also has a regular and a systemd version.
- Rediscover 5y agoNo, it sorta does not come into play... The first time, it is whatever is suggested. Then whatever works for You. After doing LFS or similar, You have most of the knowledge to choose. Me, I use rc files, but then I'm a Slackware Linux/OpenBSD snob. (Oh, init.d drives me up the wall. Learn which kill signals do what You want) Edit: s/ if / of /
- sylware 5y agoContext: desktop (gaming enabled). I have my own LFS and no systemd... neither init.d. I have only an idiotic parallel startup SH script (busybox), already overkill. The main trade-off is I do compile as built-in the linux SH script support module.