The loophole mentioned in reply 30044019 is certainly interesting. But it's also important to note that the enforcement of the license is also heavily depended

The loophole mentioned in reply 30044019 is certainly interesting. But it's also important to note that the enforcement of the license is also heavily depended on the law. After all that's what the document is designed for. Hypothetically, a lawyer might argue that the act of setting up a filtering reverse proxy counts as active violation of the license. All and all, the eventual result will be determined by the court, not people reading the license online. Of course, a clearer license without such possible loophole is better (i.e. the license should explicitly enforce _public_ access of the source code, not just access of the source code).