...The policy authors acknowledged that this may make the rule toothless in practice... Er, hello? If the policy is just a paper tiger, perhaps that fact shoul

...The policy authors acknowledged that this may make the rule toothless in practice... Er, hello? If the policy is just a paper tiger, perhaps that fact should go in the title? I think this is a great step, but if it's largely symbolic, that's a pretty important part of the story and doesn't deserve to be in paragraph 10 I'm left questioning how much is real and how much is spin, which is not where I want to be as a reader.