4 ms·
congratulations, you have reinvented https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Standard_Base https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Standard_Base, which is dead. it's no
by Hello71 5y ago
congratulations, you have reinvented https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Standard_Base https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Standard_Base, which is dead. it's not a terrible idea, but had a number of fundamental problems. first, it was a massive undertaking primarily driven from the "enterprise" side with minimal support in the community. the former isn't necessarily an issue, but the latter was a death sentence for a supposedly comprehensive standard. furthermore, the goal of LSB is fundamentally at odds with the extensible and decentralized nature of Linux; full adoption would destroy most of the value of Linux as a customizable system.
funnily enough, though, Red Hat failed with LSB, but systemd is, for better or worse, accomplishing much of the same goals, causing many of the same issues of poor extensibility and customizability.
- eternityforest 5y agoLinux seems to be a lot more enterprise dominated now, so perhaps LSB could make a comeback. The new trendy solution seems to just be having different tiers for devices that can't handle the full thing. Customizability itself is, to some degree at odds with pretty much all of what the majority of users who are not hobbyists want, so I'm not sure it's the best plan to prioritize that. On the other hand, the current solution of pretending that only Ubuntu and Red Hat exist and leaving other distros to figure out the compatibility for themselves seems to be a slight less restrictive de facto standard that works well for most.