3 ms·
My guess is they'll initially sortie from Romania, maintaining IFF silence for plausible deniability, while a coordinated strike with man-and-vehicle portable S
by GauntletWizard 5y ago
My guess is they'll initially sortie from Romania, maintaining IFF silence for plausible deniability, while a coordinated strike with man-and-vehicle portable SAMs retakes enough airspace in the western part of the country to support further operations.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- yrgulation 5y agoThat explains a lot.
- logifail 5y ago> plausible deniability You're proposing military aircraft owned by an EU member state should launch from their airfields in EU, sneak over the border and land in Ukraine, refuel and (re-)arm - and perhaps get a quick paint job too and have the aviation equivalent of their serial numbers filed off - then start attacking Russian forces in Ukraine, and our plan would be basically to hope that the enemy with apparently complete air superiority plus satellite capability might not notice? I'm firmly anti-war; that plan sounds like a great way to drag the EU and/or NATO straight into this one.
- GekkePrutser 5y agoOn the other hand, we're already supplying Ukraine with many types of weapons. Airplanes are just one more type.
- petre 5y agoThat would definitely drag NATO into the war, so no.