3 ms·
Here's better, more numerate coverage: https://twitter.com/energybants/status/1498005296299622408 https://twitter.com/energybants/status/1498005296299622408 Al
by joshe 5y ago
Here's better, more numerate coverage: https://twitter.com/energybants/status/1498005296299622408 https://twitter.com/energybants/status/1498005296299622408
Also the whole thread covers other nuclear topics the press is a bit lost on. Remember, the number of nuclear engineers at reuters is 0.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- stdbrouw 5y ago“As Energy Ministries across the EU become "ecology" Ministries led by people who don't even know the units used to quantify energy, Finance Ministries become the adults.” This is not more numerate coverage, it’s semi-informed snark.
- joshe 5y agoHere's the CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-w-nelson-484b0713 https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-w-nelson-484b0713 Considerably more numerate coverage, it's WELL-informed snark. Is snark the exclusive domain of journalists? They are certainly the world's main supplier of it. But it seems like everyone else should get to play too.
- rossdavidh 5y ago"Weather: famously indifferent to German wartime needs." Ouch.
- joshe 5y agoI really like that line too.
- Schlaefer 5y agoKeep in mind that this persons appears to be a pro nuclear industry lobbyist. So the number of objective nuclear opinions on this twitter account is 0.
- acidburnNSA 5y agoWhen someone becomes an expert in something and goes professional, they can no longer be trusted to have any objective thoughts or statements.