>In other words, aging research doesn't have a bad reputation because people are morally opposed to aging research, it has a bad reputation because it's just pr

>In other words, aging research doesn't have a bad reputation because people are morally opposed to aging research, it has a bad reputation because it's just pretty dismal as science The quality of the science has nothing to do with it. Being against aging has the same emotional reaction from people in general as pissing in public. That's not how people would react if their issue was with the science.