>Satellites with high powered lasers are a fantasy that don't exist right now. You need approximately a 5KW laser to do the job. Virtually all satellites have

>Satellites with high powered lasers are a fantasy that don't exist right now. You need approximately a 5KW laser to do the job. Virtually all satellites have this much power available. So this 'fantasy' is that you don't believe these sattelites are in orbit? It's quite obvious that this wouldn't be public knowledge. I admit I have no idea. >The converted Boeing 747 airborne laser was a colossal failure and would have only been able to target a missile nearby in its boost/launch phase. It's now dismantled. So to be clear, an ICBM flies at like mach 15-30. So it quickly leaves range of the 747. It was indeed scrapped, but was it? Did missile defence agency in around 2009 just decide they don't know what to do and havent done anything since? They received 9 billion $ in 2021 and this sentence is literally all we know: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Army_Futures_Command#GPI https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Army_Futures_Com... Is it simply top secret or did they utterly fail in their job? >You think you can send fighters to gun down an icbm MIRV in its re-entry phase? Seriously? If all you have is that, like canada, then that's what you have to do. It doesn't matter how probable the success is.