Not who you asked but I'll reply anyway. >And as far as banking is concerned, Bitcoin was never designed to solve the actual problems created by the banking in

Not who you asked but I'll reply anyway. >And as far as banking is concerned, Bitcoin was never designed to solve the actual problems created by the banking industry, only to be the new medium by which they operated. Bitcoins original goal was to try and solve the trusted third-party issue. "A peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution." So definitely not be the new medium through which banks operated. > Peter Thiel, who also went from wealthy to ultra-wealthy off the Web2 boom via PayPal, loves crypto, and is friends with a bunch of eugenics advocates who promote cryptocurrency as a return to “sound money” for a whole bunch of extremely racist reasons because when they start talking about banks and bankers, they mean Jews. Guilt by association isn't an argument. You tried to use the same trick on me by calling me a shill, so maybe that's why you don't recognize the logical fallacy. Either way, it's not valid. It's a staple in any propaganda handbook though. Web2.0 was coined in 2004, two years after Paypal IPOd by the way. We're on quote number two and the "arguments" are already at rock bottom, I'll stop here.