3 ms·
What is your hardware if I may ask ? 60ms is outrageous - I run the stock kernel and have had no issues with fairly small buffer sized, e.g. 32/48/64 frames (ar
by jcelerier 5y ago
What is your hardware if I may ask ? 60ms is outrageous - I run the stock kernel and have had no issues with fairly small buffer sized, e.g. 32/48/64 frames (around 1 millisecond) in jack settings
- alar44 5y agoI'd bet money they haven't played with their buffer size, because you're right, 60ms is basically unusable unless you're just mixing. I had a PC 15 years ago with a PCI Layla 8 channel input that got better latency than 60ms.
- jcelerier 5y ago> I had a PC 15 years ago with a PCI Layla 8 channel input aha the first soundcard I bought was an ESP 1010... brings back good memories ! it was running on and it was also able to go quite below 60 ms too, I did not have too many issues playing live with guitar amp sims with it, between 8 and 10ms of latency IIRC ? on an athlon xp 3000 or 3200+...
- viraptor 5y agoiRig2. It was some time ago, so I can't give you all details for comparison, but I'm pretty sure that was pre-buffer-tweaking. However making the buffer smaller improved both sides so xanmod was still winning. (With the same small buffer xanmod was perfect but stock started getting xruns)