It seems relatively simple to target behavior and label it 'unethical'. What is arguably as challenging as crash-proof code itself is the notion of a standard

It seems relatively simple to target behavior and label it 'unethical'. What is arguably as challenging as crash-proof code itself is the notion of a standard that is simple, complete, agreed-upon, secure, and future-proof enough that at least a large majority of people say: "Yep. Falling in line with that." I, for one, would like to see the FSF's ideas expand a bit more into hardware and services. Yet there seems no rush. *Why* there is no rush may reveal a bit about the nature of hardware- and service offerings.