3 ms·
> “freedom for people that have a stance I don’t like to protest that stance” Agreed. I'm saddened (and a little disturbed) that many HN users have such a kne
by dane-pgp 5y ago
> “freedom for people that have a stance I don’t like to protest that stance”
Agreed. I'm saddened (and a little disturbed) that many HN users have such a knee-jerk reaction against the truckers protest that they would downvote a comment that was actually arguing against government backdoors.
- t-writescode 5y agoIf you're referring to your own comment, I absolutely read that as encouraging government backdoors and I absolutely downvoted it on that reason. If there was sarcasm, it wasn't clearly visible to me.
- dane-pgp 5y agoPoe's law strikes again. I should have put a "/s" on there, and I apologise if my comment wasn't as clear written down as it was in my head. The fact that my comment appeared to be condemning all political change was meant as a clue that only a dictator would support such a position, though.