4 ms·
Something I don't think is mentioned here is that initially the Boeing designers thought that both sensors were being used for the data but the code written onl
by user_7832 5y ago
Something I don't think is mentioned here is that initially the Boeing designers thought that both sensors were being used for the data but the code written only took it off a single sensor. Whether it was not properly communicated to the coders or what, it is not clear, but someone at Boeing had wanted multiple sensors.
(I don't remember the exact source, I'd written a report of the Max-8 crashes and this was part of what I found. If you're interested in a generally excellent source for the accident/design flaws, the (latter) US Department of Transport report is excellent. I can also share my work if someone is curious, though its quality and depth is of course much lesser.)
- zarmin 5y agoSomeone should invent a way to check whether software is working correctly. Call it "writing checks" or "check driven development" or something.
- radu_floricica 5y agoIf they don't get the requirements right, they'll just write the tests wrong as well. You have the same problems, just with a bunch of extra green oks.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]