3 ms·
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. This isn't that. I'd be first to condemn - if true - but given the current state of propaganda masquerading
by 0xbadc0de5 5y ago
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. This isn't that.
I'd be first to condemn - if true - but given the current state of propaganda masquerading as journalism that we see on every side of many high-stakes issues, I will lean toward skepticism until indisputable evidence is presented. The question to ask is "who benefits from this report?"
- mrcode007 5y agoThe original report was issued by the army to Ukrainian civilians as a warning. Who benefits from that? That is pretty clear. No need for playing Sherlock Holmes here. The newspaper later republished this with attribution. I don’t think there’s need to attributing malice for a country that was invaded. Unless you think that the Ukraine is doing propaganda and the invasion here