Yeah, enterprise pricing typically works that way. It's designed for businesses, not individuals. Smaller teams pay 3.33 cents a month based on the pricing page

Yeah, enterprise pricing typically works that way. It's designed for businesses, not individuals. Smaller teams pay 3.33 cents a month based on the pricing page that was pointed out to you and individuals can sign up for free. I also find the copy claim to be entirely ironic. They're both commercial companies chasing dollars. The OSS sales model is simple. Get companies/people hooked on OSS, have them reach the boundaries of the OSS product and then sell them a commercial license. Most people can and will just move to the better enterprise offering which is probably why I see so little GitLab out in the wild. Based on what I'm seeing/hearing from MSFT, GitHub is basically a free product that now comes with your MSFT enterprise agreement. If you agree to spend enough Azure or Visual Studio dollars MSFT agrees to pony up GitHub licenses. GitLab can't compete on that level, and the offering alone isn't compelling enough for your average fortune 500 when it comes to spending money.