3 ms·
Low risk (due to him not challenging people in ways that could expose them), and high impact, I'd say.
by sva_ 5y ago
Low risk (due to him not challenging people in ways that could expose them), and high impact, I'd say.
- tpmx 5y agoHe is essentially a highbrow fluffer. The weakest kind of "intellectual" interviewer imaginable. Sometimes it works well (e.g. the Jim Keller eps), often not. I have a feeling this will be one of those times where it doesn't work.