5 ms·
If you zoom out far enough, you could also blame Nato for this whole shitshow: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMi
by od1nos 5y ago
If you zoom out far enough, you could also blame Nato for this whole shitshow:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4
- keymone 5y agoAh yes, the “NATO will deploy nukes in direct vicinity of Moscow”, completely demolished by the fact that Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland are already NATO members on border with Russia and just as close to Moscow. Now the only question remains: are you spreading this propaganda intentionally? Edit: following guidelines
- jacquesm 5y agoThat last sentence does not improve your comment.
- selectodude 5y agoYes it does. These people need to be ostracized.
- jacquesm 5y agoIndeed, but it does break the guidelines and that can be weaponized against the poster.
- keymone 5y agothe last question is the most critical part of my comment. it's war and everybody who is malicious - is my enemy that has to be eliminated by any means necessary.
- vl 5y agoYou, of course, is educated enough to remember that whole Caribbean crisis was in response to US placing nukes in Turkey.
- keymone 5y agogosh, it's so hard to be respectful here... your argument is: 1. US deployed nukes to Turkey, 2. to which USSR responded symmetrically by attempting to deploy nukes in Cuba, 3. to which US responded with blockade 4. and therefore Russian invasion to Ukraine is justified 5. because NATO may deploy nukes in Ukraine 4. simply doesn't follow from previous 3 points because the assumption in 5. is incorrect in three ways: 1. Ukraine is not in NATO so NATO doesn't have the capability to deploy nukes there 2. If NATO needed nukes close to Moscow - they ALREADY HAVE where to do that - Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland 3. US was responding with blockade to ACTIVE DEPLOYMENT PROCESS of nukes, which isn't happening in Ukraine
- vl 5y agoNo, I never said it’s justified. More over, this war is highly unpopular in Russia itself (dictatorship countries can be engaged in unpopular wars). But to understand it you need to look at it from Putin’s perspective: “NATO is explicitly was anti-Soviet, and now is anti-Russian organization. It continues to rapidly expand right next to Russia’s borders. It is a security threat. It deployed nukes in close proximity in the past.” The point is that something unjustified from your perspective is justified from Putin’s perspective.
- jacquesm 5y agoWhat Putin's perspective is doesn't really matter though, he will do whatever he wants to do for whatever misguided/crazy reasoning is going on in his head. In the end the only thing that matters is how the rest of the world reacts. Letting a megalomaniacal dictator that has clearly lost command of his senses run amok, especially when in control of a large nuclear arsenal is a risk we can not really afford, and appeasing such a person will only feed into the cycle of demands.
- jacquesm 5y agoOnly if you believe another pile of Russian propaganda.