3 ms·
It’d be tricky to define criminal criteria based solely on running a Ponzi scheme so there isn’t a “USC Section #” crime called “Ponzi Scheming”. They just char
by mikeyouse 5y ago
It’d be tricky to define criminal criteria based solely on running a Ponzi scheme so there isn’t a “USC Section #” crime called “Ponzi Scheming”. They just charge the various illegal parts of the scheme separately. His charges:
Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud—Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1349
Maximum penalty: Twenty years in prison, forfeiture, restitution, and $250,000 fine
Wire Fraud—Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1343
Maximum penalty: Twenty years in prison, forfeiture, restitution, and $250,000 fine
Conspiracy—Title 18, U.S.C., Section 371
Maximum penalty: Five years in prison, and $250,000 fine
Operation of Unlicensed Money Transmitting Business—Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1960
Maximum penalty: Five years in prison, forfeiture, and $250,000 fine
Money Laundering Conspiracy—Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1956(h)
Maximum penalty: Twenty years in prison, forfeiture, and $250,000 fine
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdca/pr/founder-fraudulent-cryptocurrency-charged-2-billion-bitconnect-ponzi-scheme https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdca/pr/founder-fraudulent-cryp...
- parineum 5y agoI'm not sure what you expected. If operating a Ponzi scheme didn't involve doing anything illegal, it'd be legal.