I think that boils down to whether concerns of Putin would be "more heard" if they were expressed by different person. From my point of view, some of these conc

I think that boils down to whether concerns of Putin would be "more heard" if they were expressed by different person. From my point of view, some of these concerns were quite important for, let's say, viability of Russia as country with a pinch of independence. I rephrase. If Russia wants some independence in its decisions from external influence(#), the concerns raised by Putin are valid whoever is the leader of Russia. I think it is unfortunate if the acceptance of these concerns depends on the person expressing them. Moreso, I think it is unrealistic to expect that different person would express same concerns and get different results without exchange of some other important pieces. In other words, it appears that NATO does not like Russia in its current form. Of course I am glad to accept you apologies and, in turn, I would like to express mines. I know I can be excessively sarcastic in my tone and I would like to apologize for that. (#) I came to think that politics are all about "whose influence we prefer this time of day". The right to choose is still important.