3 ms·
> Game theory says “on three JUMP HIM!” Yes, sure. But what you're betting on here is that when Sweden says "on three JUMP HIM!", the rest will follow. And whe
by pakitan 5y ago
> Game theory says “on three JUMP HIM!”
Yes, sure. But what you're betting on here is that when Sweden says "on three JUMP HIM!", the rest will follow. And when you have multiple countries now refusing to take Russia out of SWIFT, which is a relatively benign measure, compared to an all-out war, how confident are you that they will come in your defense in case of an actual war against a nuclear power?
- iostream24 5y ago> And when you have multiple countries now refusing to take Russia out of SWIFT Not anymore. It takes a little bit to organize independently run republics, but once things get rolling… Also, there was this 1994 accord called the Budapest Memorandum… Mr P bit off more than he can chew, this time. There will be more NATO… Just when we thought it was all getting rather irrelevant and dated… Nothing like a “master strategist “ to galvanize the entire world against him suddenly when he had a substantial reserve of social capital in the leadup to this…
- iostream24 5y agoAlso > > Game theory says “on three JUMP HIM!” > Yes, sure. But what you're betting on here is that when Sweden says "on three JUMP HIM!", the rest will follow Which is precisely what NATO provides