3 ms·
I think they're trying to make their interface look exactly like Bing so the only way Microsoft can compete is by having better search results. You guys at HN
by 0xABADC0DA 15y ago
I think they're trying to make their interface look exactly like Bing so the only way Microsoft can compete is by having better search results.
You guys at HN probably don't check out Bing very much, but many of the UI changes in Google were in Bing first... hover over a search result to show more info on the side, image search with just images (details when you hover), infinite scroll on image search, background image on main search page, etc.
- jen_h 15y agoWhich is terrible. I use Bing as a backup for Google when Google fails me (not often), and I just don't like all of Bing's noise, the background graphics, the sidebar stuff, the slow load time, the Facebook Like button (FFS, WHY??), the "Check out our other services!" topbar that keeps the search field from loading until it's finished, ugh. It seems like Google is becoming more Bing-like with each passing day. This is not a good thing. What is great and always has been great about Google (and why, I believe, it's a staple for many of us after over a decade!) is its great results paired with simplicity and fast load time (please don't get me started on Instant Search, it's not a pretty rant). Google Search, be yourself, the self that's kept you as the autocompleted "g" in my URL bar for well over a decade now. Don't go chasing waterfalls. They take forever to load.
- kongqiu 15y agoDuckDuckGo! I'd say the search results are better/less cluttered about 60% of the time, and google or bing are only a !bang away...
- jen_h 15y agoHrm, DDG's Privacy Policy http://duckduckgo.com/privacy.html http://duckduckgo.com/privacy.html is enough reason to move over, methinks! Now to move muscle memory from g to d. ;)