5 ms·
Here's the earliest copy (2020) of the "Who We Are" page from the source domain available on the Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20200405160640/ht
by jka 5y ago
Here's the earliest copy (2020) of the "Who We Are" page from the source domain available on the Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20200405160640/https://www.iswresearch.org/p/who-we-are.html https://web.archive.org/web/20200405160640/https://www.iswre...
The copyright notice on the page dates back a little further, to 2018.
It is the postcursor to a previous domain for (approximately?) the same organization, which dates back to 2007: https://web.archive.org/web/20070322221547/http://www.understandingwar.org/ https://web.archive.org/web/20070322221547/http://www.unders...
- axiosgunnar 5y agoMeaning?
- jka 5y agoAn attempt to share some facts for the future to look back on, not really relevant for today's conversation.
- credit_guy 5y agoI don't get it. You are saying these guys should not be trusted? Are they biased towards Russia, or towards Ukraine? Or what? And why?
- jka 5y agoHey, thanks for asking. I'm an open book - can you explain why those questions sprang to mind? All I intend to provide is observations.
- EliRivers 5y agoThere are an infinity of observations to be made about anything. Are yours random, or guided? Why did you observe that in particular, rather than anything else in the infinite range of things to observe?
- jka 5y agoWhat difference does it make? :)
- dredmorbius 5y agoContext and background are relevant. Being gratuitously evasive in response to questions is at best annoying. If you can provide context do. If you don't know, state as much. Don't be obnoxious.