4 ms·
> it is predominantly used by dissidents and people in opposition to Putin's regime [...] So it should be blocked. Well, at least your stance is clear. Obvious
by kodablah 5y ago
> it is predominantly used by dissidents and people in opposition to Putin's regime [...] So it should be blocked.
Well, at least your stance is clear. Obviously most will disagree with a government blocking a site for being used by the current leader's opposition.
- tadfisher 5y agoI don't think you're reading the post charitably or correctly.
- kodablah 5y agoAh, I see...maybe the OP means FB should be blocked because they are not doing individual blocking at the government's request? I think it's still pretty easy to disagree with that justification too (same as I'd disagree if a US ISP was forced to block a Russian site that didn't kowtow to US requests). And it's still easy to see that the reasons given by the OP for why it risks getting blocked are disagreeable to.
- cutemonster 5y ago(I asked what was meant, in a sibling reply)