Anyone who is very serious about strong lines between "fancy" art and "low-class" art can be safely dismissed as an idiot. It takes only the tiniest bit of hist

Anyone who is very serious about strong lines between "fancy" art and "low-class" art can be safely dismissed as an idiot. It takes only the tiniest bit of historical knowledge to understand that these things frequently, and frequently-rapidly evolve, usually from "low-class" to "fancy." See e.g. theatre, jazz, etc.