> YouTube has no right or requirement to operate at that scale. so only you can be smug, eh ? > They've consciously decided to scale past what they're able to

> YouTube has no right or requirement to operate at that scale. so only you can be smug, eh ? > They've consciously decided to scale past what they're able to manage well. That is not true. They are doing quite well considering the overall scale. > I'd be impressed by their scale only if they managed to maintain some level of quality also. So you assess quality by random one-off/anecdotal articles always highlighting the negative ? How do you know what their quality is when you can never know the number of abusive videos correctly blocked ?