6 ms·

This will be a fix coming to virtually every major country very soon. "Disinformation" and "Misinformation" and "hate" stuff is going to hit every country and i

This will be a fix coming to virtually every major country very soon. "Disinformation" and "Misinformation" and "hate" stuff is going to hit every country and it's not surprising how quick everyone has moved on this. Let me describe what just went down in Canada. A national catastrophe. If you disagree with my take, I'm happy to provide sources. We have a vaccine mandate disproportionately harming racial minorities, it's still in place. Why do Black Canadians not get vaccinated? Tuskegee? I don't know. Why do the indigenous? Maybe because the Canadian government has a history of experimenting on them? Ultimately doesn't matter as part of the discussion. We look to our 2 greatest allies, USA and UK. They had no mandates or at least had a roadmap to the end. We didn't have a roadmap and we just unemployed those people? There's legitimate cause for protest. This article can be my proof that the protest in Ottawa was diverse: https://thepostmillennial.com/jagmeet-singh-faces-backlash-after-accusing-truckers-of-white-supremacy https://thepostmillennial.com/jagmeet-singh-faces-backlash-a... The problem was that the Canadian media labelled the convoy as a bunch of nazis. there was literally only 1 nazi flag and there also just happened to have professional photographers following him? Was he even party of the convoy/protest? That was enough though, the hate convoy was fabricated. There's virtually no nazis and certainly no confederates in Canada. That's not our thing. Hell, the total protest size is estimated well above 100,000 people. Even if Canada has nazis, we don't have that many. Not once did Trudeau go talk to the protest. He refused because they were all a bunch of nazis with unacceptable views. The ottawa police couldn't do anything against their right to protest and it was big enough that Trudeau couldn't keep ignoring. People demanded action against these nazis before they overthrow the government. Trudeau deployed martial law and arrested the lawful protest. Those illegal nazis looking to overthrow the government! Trudeau in parliament even got to calling a Jewish MP a nazi for standing with swastikas. He even refused to apologize and doubled down later(a jewish liberal MP called her a nazi as well) Crushing dissent in Canada got denunciation by tons of good left-wing celebrities. Worse yet, the judge who is presiding over the court cases of these protesters is a liberal party candidate back in 2011. Clear conflict of interest. Right before the Ukraine invasion, Trudeau absolutely abruptly stopped all the name calling over night. He then spoke that there's a great need to start talking to your friends and family who have differing political views. Typical anti echo chamber stuff. This is the day he got briefed about Putin's invasion I am sure. He went from declaring martial law to revoking it in an instant. Baffling everyone. There's literally a Liberal senator who asserted "Honk Honk" actually stands for Heil Hitler. Absolute crazy person. Meanwhile Jordan peterson was having a heart attack online because he justly saw the tyranny of the government for what it was. The government did crush dissent. We do have political prisoners. This is a current catastrophe that hasn't been fixed at all. Attention went to Ukraine for good reason, but we have a nightmare still in Canada. This abrupt 180 on the national emergency, Trudeau baffled everyone. People said 'oh the polls are in', Nope. Polls are in, they havent budged. senate was going to vote against(they werent). the various global celebrities calling Trudeau out on his actions. Nope. Our PM just quietly admitted to it during the Ukraine sanctions speech, in his speech he said, and I paraphrase and taken out of context and ruined in every way, "for the past few weeks putin has been controlling the media" Putin has controlled the media for decades in Russia. This was an admission of Canadian media. The past few weeks have been the convoy. In fact, international media were fantastic. NYTimes put their political ideology aside and called Trudeau out. Round of applause for the NYtimes. In fact, the international media were generally pretty fair, many didnt agree with the point of the protest, but agreed the protest should continue. They went to the protest because the Canadian media labelled this protest as 100,000 strong nazis looking to overthrow the government. International media saw a fantastic story because Canadians are generally good people, but when they got boots on the ground... that's obviously not what they found. Putin made it clear: He was invading to denazify Ukraine. Ironically the amazing president of ukraine is jewish. But we heard this just recently didn't we... Who else just called a Jewish person a Nazi? No, Trudeau simply got disinformed to an extreme degree by Russian propaganda. His echo chamber told him everyone was a nazi. All this BS about nazis, systemic racism and all that crap is Putin. The journalists who have been pushing all this nazi crap are russian agents. In fact, this entire protest was covered by rt.com about 100x more than the CBC covered it. Fox news was like 50x more than the CBC. Other entities covered it about the same. I would bet good money that the RCMP and CSIS are investigating those journalists today. The world is about to pass laws to ban disinformation because it was clearly weaponized by Russia. However, we have an ongoing injustice here in Canada. I expect monday when parliament resumes Trudeau will offer that apology to Melissa Lantsman. I hope he elaborates on this more.

mjevans 5y ago
Far too many points in one post to reply properly. I'll pick JUST vaccine mandates. This is what I want to see: everyone that the vaccine is authorized for use in, should be required, under penalty of detention in quarantine bubbles, to be vaccinated. Exceptions: 1) Medically infirm to the point of specialized, dedicated care which states on a record to the health departments that this individual is medically compromised and ineligible for a wide range of medical treatments, not just this latest vaccine. 2) Individuals too young for current vaccine approval ranges (E.G. emergency use authorized, but not wide approval). 3) Hard core anti-medical religious exemption, full DNR, Do-not-medicate, natural care people. This also includes end of life hospice care (which is a bit more sane IMO) as well as anyone that wants to live like it's 1600. A reader might note I've made a distinction between people that only refuse the pandemic vaccines and still want all other 'normal' medical care VERSUS those who either already have abnormal medical care or want only non-life-extending (E.G. pain management) care. The intention here is to promote herd immunity via as prolific application of vaccination as possible while retaining fairness towards edge cases not caused by insanity but merely unfortunate circumstances, and fairness towards legitimate religious exceptions rather than some 'want to feel special' misuse of that tag. Anyone else can be arrested, detained in a drunk / quarantine tank, and while under supervised authority standard medical care applied (I.E. having been found guilty of endangering the public through lack of civil responsibility, incarcerated for... say a month and during that month they'd be given both shots.)
- ukraineally 5y ago
  >Far too many points in one post to reply properly. Sorry, complicated issue, I could have gone much more deep as well. >This is what I want to see: everyone that the vaccine is authorized for use in, should be required, under penalty of detention in quarantine bubbles, to be vaccinated. I am fully vaccinated but I will not be getting a booster until some very serious improvements in human rights are returned. Certainly an interesting take. "penalty of detention" means prison. So you want to remove voluntary and informed consent when it comes to medication under threat of force, coercion and removing free will in a matter of bodily autonomy? >Exceptions I did not read your exceptions at all. I have some questions about the first part. Let me define my position a little clearer than above. The person involved in medical treatment should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. Do you disagree with this statement? I would really like to know that before we continue.

mjevans 5y ago

Far too many points in one post to reply properly. I'll pick JUST vaccine mandates. This is what I want to see: everyone that the vaccine is authorized for use in, should be required, under penalty of detention in quarantine bubbles, to be vaccinated. Exceptions: 1) Medically infirm to the point of specialized, dedicated care which states on a record to the health departments that this individual is medically compromised and ineligible for a wide range of medical treatments, not just this latest vaccine. 2) Individuals too young for current vaccine approval ranges (E.G. emergency use authorized, but not wide approval). 3) Hard core anti-medical religious exemption, full DNR, Do-not-medicate, natural care people. This also includes end of life hospice care (which is a bit more sane IMO) as well as anyone that wants to live like it's 1600. A reader might note I've made a distinction between people that only refuse the pandemic vaccines and still want all other 'normal' medical care VERSUS those who either already have abnormal medical care or want only non-life-extending (E.G. pain management) care. The intention here is to promote herd immunity via as prolific application of vaccination as possible while retaining fairness towards edge cases not caused by insanity but merely unfortunate circumstances, and fairness towards legitimate religious exceptions rather than some 'want to feel special' misuse of that tag. Anyone else can be arrested, detained in a drunk / quarantine tank, and while under supervised authority standard medical care applied (I.E. having been found guilty of endangering the public through lack of civil responsibility, incarcerated for... say a month and during that month they'd be given both shots.)

ukraineally 5y ago
>Far too many points in one post to reply properly. Sorry, complicated issue, I could have gone much more deep as well. >This is what I want to see: everyone that the vaccine is authorized for use in, should be required, under penalty of detention in quarantine bubbles, to be vaccinated. I am fully vaccinated but I will not be getting a booster until some very serious improvements in human rights are returned. Certainly an interesting take. "penalty of detention" means prison. So you want to remove voluntary and informed consent when it comes to medication under threat of force, coercion and removing free will in a matter of bodily autonomy? >Exceptions I did not read your exceptions at all. I have some questions about the first part. Let me define my position a little clearer than above. The person involved in medical treatment should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. Do you disagree with this statement? I would really like to know that before we continue.