3 ms·
I agree completely. However, there are many situations where it can be reduced. For instance, I've heard chatter about people wondering about Apple's exposure t
by MR4D 5y ago
I agree completely. However, there are many situations where it can be reduced. For instance, I've heard chatter about people wondering about Apple's exposure to China[0] should China back Russia in the Ukraine conflict. At some point, it would be within Apple's best interest to look at reducing their dependency on a possible opponent.
[0] - Obviously we can pick any number of company and country matchups for this discussion, but China is obviously the relevant discussion point to this topic, and Apple is a huge American company, so the example is much less esoteric than others. I'm not picking on Apple here at all.
- baybal2 5y agoiWatches might just got sanctioned because of their glass comes from Russian company with state links. They chose to save on Corning's glass, with dire consequences for themselves.
- ClumsyPilot 5y agoAlways nice when a company with 70% margin chooses to save a few pennies
- ksec 5y agoExactly. Like all things Apple, I have no problem with them choosing money over something else. ( May be I do but it is up to them to decide ) I have problem with them constantly lying ( or spinning ) all the the glass they use are from US Corning.