Yes and no. That tool would simply unmask the text. If the text is not there to begin with, then there is nothing to unmask. So it depends on the programmer who

Yes and no. That tool would simply unmask the text. If the text is not there to begin with, then there is nothing to unmask. So it depends on the programmer who creates the text in there. For me, since this was an obvious security hole, I always inherited base classes and created the real text to be kept somewhere else in memory. Still doable to be found with Cheat Engine for example, but harder by simply hovering Spy++ over it.