and the US signed agreeing to provide assistance if they got attacked or threatened with nuclear weapons. you may say that the threats of nuclear aggression we

and the US signed agreeing to provide assistance if they got attacked or threatened with nuclear weapons. you may say that the threats of nuclear aggression were thinly veiled but not technically apply because the word nuclear has not been used. but if you applied an honest interpretation of what is happening you would say that point 4 does apply. > 4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used". nobody wants a nuclear war so it's better if the US stays out of it at this point, but just I'm pointing out that got screwed by more than one signer on that treaty.