4 ms·
No, his past actions were a great service to the world. At the same time, his current behaviour means I no longer find him to be a meaningful source of comment
by cldellow 5y ago
No, his past actions were a great service to the world.
At the same time, his current behaviour means I no longer find him to be a meaningful source of commentary. He called Trudeau "tyrannical and obscene" -- no followup comment when, days later, Trudeau revoked the Emergencies Act. He mocked the world for trusting US intelligence that Russia was going to invade Ukraine -- no followup comment when Russia then committed a full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Again, what he did in the past: tremendous service. What he seems capable of doing today: not useful to me.
- robertlagrant 5y ago> He called Trudeau "tyrannical and obscene" -- no followup comment when, days later, Trudeau revoked the Emergencies Act Trudeau revoked use of the Emergencies Act after using it for 10 days to destroy a protest. It's hard to characterise that any other way.
- seanw444 5y agoPeople are using the revocation as justification for enacting it in the first place.