3 ms·
Why wasn't .net considered? The whole article is very weird, and there is little to learn from it. Wind on till they've actually made the port, and have run it
by cesaref 5y ago
Why wasn't .net considered?
The whole article is very weird, and there is little to learn from it. Wind on till they've actually made the port, and have run it for some time and then there will be some interesting lessons learnt, gazing into my crystal ball it will be somethong like 'turned out to be harder and take longer than we thought, but the result is good'
- axiosgunnar 5y agoThey have one short sentence plonked in there saying "Java was not considered". They didn't give a reason why. They didn't mention .net anywhere.
- EdwardDiego 5y agoBut that's the point. Why was it only Rust and Go when memory safety is a big deal and also can the author please show me on the doll where the bad Java hurt him?