> if Bethesda doesn't defend their claim on the "Elder Scrolls" name, they can lose it. Only if there's a chance of the usage being misleading. Otherwise the u

> if Bethesda doesn't defend their claim on the "Elder Scrolls" name, they can lose it. Only if there's a chance of the usage being misleading. Otherwise the usages are supposed to co-exist. Anyways, the scrolls they refer to are actual scroll objects. They aren't using it in the slightest bit creatively. A trademark on a game called 'The Sword of the Kingslayer' might conflict with another game called 'Spell for the Kingslayer', as they both follow the pattern '_ of/for the kingslayer' and kingslayer is a relatively unique word. Sword and spell are not. > if I created a new game called "Warcraft" Did Mojang create a game called TES: Oblivion? No. So the appropriate analogy would be you creating a game called 'War', a generic thing not invented by Blizzard and not in any way exclusively associated with their games.