3 ms·
What should they peacekeep? The Russians are not butchering civilians, their goal is to demilitarize the country and replace the government. There will be no at
by 88840-8855 5y ago
What should they peacekeep? The Russians are not butchering civilians, their goal is to demilitarize the country and replace the government. There will be no attack on peaceful civilians, hopefully. Civil unrest will be solved the way how Russia is solving that. But that could NEVER be prevented by peacekeepers.
Imagine China would send peacekeepers to Canada to peacekeep the policing against the truckers.
No way.
- sofixa 5y agoThere are already attacks on civilian targets ( cities), with civilians dead and civilian buildings destroyed.
- 88840-8855 5y agoAnd how would peacekeeping ground troops help exactly against very sad and bad such civilian accidents? The Russians are not fucking dumb to kill civilians in purpose. The causalities you mention are happening due to accidents or sad and bad collateral damage.
- sofixa 5y ago> The Russians are not fucking dumb to kill civilians in purpose. They also weren't dumb enough to start a war there's no solution to, yet here we are. Bombing Kyiv and civilians dying isn't "collateral damage", because there are no legitimate military targets in the middle of a city.
- 88840-8855 5y agoThen show me where there Kiev was bombed, please.
- sofixa 5y agoIt takes a trivial amount of googling to find footage like this https://youtu.be/UWhQzWbPCbo https://youtu.be/UWhQzWbPCbo
- oriolid 5y ago"Very sad and bad such civilian accidents" is a euphemism I haven't heard before.
- mopsi 5y ago> There will be no attack on peaceful civilians, hopefully How naive can you be? Here's the grim reality: https://twitter.com/berojag59060636/status/1497131408535744514 https://twitter.com/berojag59060636/status/14971314085357445...
- 88840-8855 5y agoYes, that's very very very very very bad. And yet, and how could PEACEKEEPERS have stopped that?