> that expressiveness is what’s really enjoyable, and pretty much impossible to find elsewhere. I've often thought it's because CSS is lower-level, more like a

> that expressiveness is what’s really enjoyable, and pretty much impossible to find elsewhere. I've often thought it's because CSS is lower-level, more like a tool for creating UI libraries (similar to writing e.g. OpenGL directly vs a higher-level scene graph lib built on top of it)—but when you want to make something unique, there's really no competition. > I think it could and will be easier though, not as something totally different, but simply improving what’s there; basically continuing the path it’s already been on for the past decades. Seems likely to me too.